Total Commodity Programs in Kalkaska County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 120
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kalkaska County, Michigan totaled $3,541,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James B Vipond | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $13,961 |
42 | Norman Anderson | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $13,266 |
43 | Gary L Jones | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $12,705 |
44 | Chuck Hill | Atlanta, MI 49709 | $12,594 |
45 | Lloy L Jones | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $12,335 |
46 | Golden Family Acres | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $12,295 |
47 | Jake M Turnipseed | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $12,199 |
48 | Robert F Lucas Sr | Superior Twp, MI 48198 | $11,960 |
49 | Jenkins Potato Farm-jenkins | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $11,200 |
50 | Jenkins Potato Farm-arsnoe | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $11,200 |
51 | Dixie Boese | Lansing, MI 48910 | $9,590 |
52 | Dorothy Jones | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $7,779 |
53 | David Joseph Beland | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $7,345 |
54 | Victor C Vipond | Spring Lake, MI 49456 | $7,277 |
55 | C Gordon Hall | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $7,226 |
56 | Patricia A Ingersoll | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $7,024 |
57 | Darwin Zimmerman | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $6,997 |
58 | Larry Birgy | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $6,765 |
59 | Carl S Okeson | Saint Paris, OH 43072 | $6,460 |
60 | Michael Kitchen | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $6,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”