Farm Subsidy information
Kalkaska County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Kalkaska County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 154
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kalkaska County, Michigan totaled $4,315,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mackenzie Erickson | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $2,006 |
102 | , | $1,961 | |
103 | Bethel Larabee | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $1,872 |
104 | Andrea Loria | Sterling Heights, MI 48313 | $1,849 |
105 | Gabriele Cerqua | Clinton Twp, MI 48038 | $1,849 |
106 | Doug Chichester | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $1,816 |
107 | Cs Vipond & Ev Vipond Trust | Sparta, MI 49345 | $1,552 |
108 | Matthew Ingersoll | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $1,500 |
109 | James Leonard Birgy | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $1,488 |
110 | Level Acres Family Farm LLC | Gaylord, MI 49735 | $1,414 |
111 | Larry Street | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,413 |
112 | Roger Devere Hall | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $1,391 |
113 | Robert E Hall | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $1,353 |
114 | Phyllis Senske | Rapid City, MI 49676 | $1,274 |
115 | Dale M Bridson | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $1,261 |
116 | Vernon L Fullerton | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $1,234 |
117 | John Taylor | Southfield, MI 48034 | $1,202 |
118 | Bradley James Smith | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $1,179 |
119 | William D Mccully | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $1,104 |
120 | Thomas Payne | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $1,050 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”