Farm Subsidy information
Kalkaska County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Kalkaska County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 40
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kalkaska County, Michigan totaled $1,132,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Matthew Ingersoll | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $1,416 |
| 22 | Mildred Jane Pence | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $1,375 |
| 23 | Myron Leo Vipond | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $994 |
| 24 | Patricia A Ingersoll | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $986 |
| 25 | Richard Allen Anderson | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $931 |
| 26 | William D Mccully | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $697 |
| 27 | James B Vipond | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $671 |
| 28 | Darwin Zimmerman | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $560 |
| 29 | Annie Marie Olds | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $557 |
| 30 | Gary L Jones | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $519 |
| 31 | Deborah Hill | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $470 |
| 32 | Lloy L Jones | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $380 |
| 33 | Cheri Wilkinson | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $379 |
| 34 | Tracy Lynn Fahl | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $330 |
| 35 | Perry D Daniels | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $277 |
| 36 | Kelli Hall | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $188 |
| 37 | Tasha Maria Wagner | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $184 |
| 38 | Bradley James Smith | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $174 |
| 39 | Larry Birgy | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $113 |
| 40 | Ronald Brinks - Dba | Mc Bain, MI 49657 | $29 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf