Total Commodity Programs in Kalkaska County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 120
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kalkaska County, Michigan totaled $3,534,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charles G Erickson | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $27,841 |
22 | Shetler Family Farm LLC | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $26,515 |
23 | Jane M Rowell | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $26,126 |
24 | Cs Vipond & Ev Vipond Trust | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $25,156 |
25 | Jenkins Family Farms LLC | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $24,858 |
26 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $24,580 |
27 | Myron Leo Vipond | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $23,763 |
28 | William Fischer | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $21,691 |
29 | Richard Allen Anderson | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $21,031 |
30 | Mildred Jane Pence | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $19,918 |
31 | Foster Mc Cool | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $19,584 |
32 | Deborah Hill | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $19,271 |
33 | Lloyd Keith Avery | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $18,782 |
34 | Richard Lisch | Terra Ceia, FL 34250 | $17,084 |
35 | Barbara Waldorf | Grayling, MI 49738 | $16,928 |
36 | Vivian Turnipseed | Gaylord, MI 49735 | $16,287 |
37 | William D Mccully | Alden, MI 49612 | $15,240 |
38 | Frank Vyverberg | South Boardman, MI 49680 | $15,207 |
39 | Martin R Woodhams | Kalkaska, MI 49646 | $14,747 |
40 | Mark Gottsleben | Fife Lake, MI 49633 | $14,655 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”