Total Conservation Programs in Kent County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 219
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kent County, Michigan totaled $3,599,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Janice Beuschel | Sparta, MI 49345 | $25,362 |
42 | Loren Schermerhorn | Cedar Springs, MI 49319 | $24,879 |
43 | T & B Grice Inc | Kent City, MI 49330 | $24,729 |
44 | Dusten G Quick | Sparta, MI 49345 | $24,570 |
45 | Russell Wolfe | Cedar Springs, MI 49319 | $23,979 |
46 | William L Hoover II | Cedar Springs, MI 49319 | $21,350 |
47 | Edward W Marker Trust | Byron Center, MI 49315 | $19,527 |
48 | Clyde Fairchild | Lowell, MI 49331 | $19,293 |
49 | Kenneth H Kooiman | Grandville, MI 49418 | $19,236 |
50 | Bertha Mc Garry | Grand Rapids, MI 49504 | $18,000 |
51 | Randall H Lotterman | Ada, MI 49301 | $18,000 |
52 | Malcolm C Brigham | Sand Lake, MI 49343 | $17,500 |
53 | Merton Williams | Cedar Springs, MI 49319 | $16,848 |
54 | Swisslane Farms LLC | Alto, MI 49302 | $16,703 |
55 | Thomas Plummer | Clarksville, MI 48815 | $15,734 |
56 | Harold Wittenbach Trust | Lowell, MI 49331 | $15,454 |
57 | H P Properties LLC | Grand Rapids, MI 49525 | $14,781 |
58 | Margaret F Jakeway | Rockford, MI 49341 | $13,886 |
59 | Marjorie Williams | Byron Center, MI 49315 | $13,329 |
60 | Paul Rogers | Kent City, MI 49330 | $13,100 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”