Counter Cyclical Program in Kent County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 387
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Kent County, Michigan totaled $2,468,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | William Ives | Cedar Springs, MI 49319 | $11,017 |
62 | Sero Lutkes | Sparta, MI 49345 | $9,915 |
63 | Thornapple Valley Dairy Farms LLC | Wayland, MI 49348 | $9,874 |
64 | Dennis M Hoekstra | Barryton, MI 49305 | $9,772 |
65 | Alvin Post | Caledonia, MI 49316 | $9,759 |
66 | Fuss Farms | Alto, MI 49302 | $9,729 |
67 | Eleanor J Warren | Cedar Springs, MI 49319 | $9,667 |
68 | Thomas P Heffron | Belding, MI 48809 | $9,463 |
69 | Jack J Hansen | Rockford, MI 49341 | $9,295 |
70 | Dennis Caverley | Greenville, MI 48838 | $9,112 |
71 | Helen June Pike | Sparta, MI 49345 | $8,320 |
72 | K & H Grain Inc | Marne, MI 49435 | $8,260 |
73 | Fay Benjamin | Cedar Springs, MI 49319 | $8,041 |
74 | G Wisner Veg Farm | Lowell, MI 49331 | $7,783 |
75 | Wayne Youngquist & Son | Kent City, MI 49330 | $7,744 |
76 | Wolfe Farms | Cedar Springs, MI 49319 | $7,710 |
77 | Bettes & Kingsbury Farms | Sparta, MI 49345 | $7,672 |
78 | Anthony Gerard Poulias | Rockford, MI 49341 | $7,660 |
79 | Andrew K Hagenow | Rockford, MI 49341 | $7,574 |
80 | Harold Piccard Jr | Grand Rapids, MI 49544 | $7,474 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”