Farm Subsidy information
Lake County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Lake County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 182
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lake County, Michigan totaled $2,801,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pamela Robinson | Chase, MI 49623 | $7,846 |
42 | Jack Thornton | Reed City, MI 49677 | $7,821 |
43 | William O Miller | Chase, MI 49623 | $6,750 |
44 | Ray Morlock | Hersey, MI 49639 | $6,617 |
45 | Milton Olds | Irons, MI 49644 | $6,615 |
46 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $6,535 |
47 | Pine Springs Farm | Luther, MI 49656 | $6,413 |
48 | Aaron Frank | Lead, SD 57754 | $5,998 |
49 | Thomas Wiley | Holland, MI 49424 | $5,945 |
50 | Allen Oomen | Custer, MI 49405 | $5,861 |
51 | Rodney Weck | Reed City, MI 49677 | $5,713 |
52 | Leon Kailing | Reed City, MI 49677 | $5,604 |
53 | Lester G Peterson | Branch, MI 49402 | $5,540 |
54 | Carl Mezeske | Brethren, MI 49619 | $5,525 |
55 | Elisabeth J Obrien | Holt, MI 48842 | $5,430 |
56 | Orval Brent Sims | Reed City, MI 49677 | $5,114 |
57 | David L Hamelund | Big Rapids, MI 49307 | $5,070 |
58 | Joann L Miller | Big Rapids, MI 49307 | $4,780 |
59 | Robert J Morlock | Reed City, MI 49677 | $4,607 |
60 | Gordon Erler | Reed City, MI 49677 | $4,126 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”