Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Leelanau County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 46
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $235,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Popp Farm | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $2,455 |
22 | Roberta Dow | Lake Ann, MI 49650 | $2,173 |
23 | Jerome J Kolarik | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,085 |
24 | Wencil T Korson | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,067 |
25 | Randy Winowiecki | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $2,045 |
26 | William Olsen | Maple City, MI 49664 | $2,009 |
27 | Pamela G Kirt Trust | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $1,978 |
28 | Randolph Weber | Cedar, MI 49621 | $1,703 |
29 | Whitt Co LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $1,682 |
30 | Edita Miller | Maple City, MI 49664 | $1,669 |
31 | Sandra M Krolik | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $1,640 |
32 | Carlson Farms | Northport, MI 49670 | $1,381 |
33 | Brian Verschaeve | Maple City, MI 49664 | $1,064 |
34 | James Burkhart | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $911 |
35 | Noonan & Sons LLC | Maple City, MI 49664 | $731 |
36 | Phyllis Korson | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $460 |
37 | Erich Lautner | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $338 |
38 | D & D Noonan Farms LLC | Empire, MI 49630 | $320 |
39 | Jm Land Ventures LLC 2019- | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $315 |
40 | Donald Parker | Cedar, MI 49621 | $210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”