Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Leelanau County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 181
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $8,701,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Stanton Orchards | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $70,136 |
42 | Victor Chimoski | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $68,701 |
43 | Jelinek Orchards Limited Liabilit | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $68,471 |
44 | Jeff Send | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $66,925 |
45 | Michael A Mcmanus | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $64,215 |
46 | Jonathan Richter | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $60,162 |
47 | Ralph Schaub | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $59,281 |
48 | , | $58,610 | |
49 | Noonan & Sons | Maple City, MI 49664 | $58,576 |
50 | Stanek Brothers | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $57,736 |
51 | S P Grossnickle LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $55,983 |
52 | Kabat Farms | Cedar, MI 49621 | $55,348 |
53 | Alpers Farms LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $55,197 |
54 | Suttons Pointe Farms | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $54,816 |
55 | Judith L Guinan | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $53,674 |
56 | James Bardenhagen | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $51,702 |
57 | David Alpers | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $51,700 |
58 | Donald Bugai | Cedar, MI 49621 | $51,654 |
59 | James Burkhart | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $51,367 |
60 | Ryan Noonan | Maple City, MI 49664 | $49,773 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”