Total Conservation Programs in Leelanau County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 88
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $658,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fyv Grl Acres | Cedar, MI 49621 | $3,030 |
42 | Thomas Van Pelt | Northport, MI 49670 | $2,926 |
43 | Robert Boomer | Empire, MI 49630 | $2,882 |
44 | Richard Popp | Northport, MI 49670 | $2,782 |
45 | Gene Allen | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,700 |
46 | James Eckerle | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,695 |
47 | O L Bahle Farms Inc | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,411 |
48 | Gary A Bardenhagen | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $2,349 |
49 | Thomas E Lufkin | Grand Haven, MI 49417 | $2,238 |
50 | Arthur C Urban | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $2,210 |
51 | Greg Williams | Cedar, MI 49621 | $2,138 |
52 | Barry Mazurek | Cedar, MI 49621 | $1,932 |
53 | Borke Orchards | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $1,896 |
54 | William S Casier | Empire, MI 49630 | $1,800 |
55 | Jelinek Orchards Limited Liabilit | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $1,790 |
56 | Lowell Goff | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $1,761 |
57 | Suttons Pointe Farms | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $1,660 |
58 | Stanton Orchards | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $1,620 |
59 | Edward J Peplinski Trust | Maple City, MI 49664 | $1,410 |
60 | Sunblossom Orchards LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $1,291 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”