Total Commodity Programs in Leelanau County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 113
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $875,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jelinek Orchards LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $5,005 |
42 | Victor Chimoski | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $4,664 |
43 | Jonathan Richter | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $4,230 |
44 | Clarence Stachnik Jr | Cedar, MI 49621 | $4,086 |
45 | Jeff Send | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $4,049 |
46 | Raftshol Vineyards, Inc. | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $3,837 |
47 | Popp Farm | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $3,398 |
48 | Doctor's Beef LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $3,304 |
49 | Duane Bardenhagen | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $3,091 |
50 | Joseph Flaska | Maple City, MI 49664 | $3,089 |
51 | Legacy Orchards Inc | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $2,986 |
52 | James Eckerle | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,965 |
53 | Ron Collins Jr | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $2,958 |
54 | Wesley Parker - Wesley H Parker Trust | Cedar, MI 49621 | $2,611 |
55 | Rhoadside Acres Inc | Cedar, MI 49621 | $2,581 |
56 | James Bardenhagen | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,562 |
57 | Denis L Garvin | Cedar, MI 49621 | $2,550 |
58 | Donald Kenneth Gallagher | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $2,479 |
59 | Olsen Farms LLC | Maple City, MI 49664 | $2,394 |
60 | Steve Christensen | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,240 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”