Farm Subsidy information
Leelanau County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Leelanau County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 451
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $44,153,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Richard Popp | Northport, MI 49670 | $135,362 |
62 | Kirk Eckerle | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $131,683 |
63 | Grant Farms | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $131,071 |
64 | Maple Valley Farms Inc - Shimek | Maple City, MI 49664 | $128,778 |
65 | Ron Collins Jr | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $127,780 |
66 | Hop Daddy LLC | Empire, MI 49630 | $125,627 |
67 | Olsen Farms | Maple City, MI 49664 | $125,244 |
68 | Cherry View Farms LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $123,942 |
69 | Richard Deering Jr | Northport, MI 49670 | $121,803 |
70 | Donald R Carlson | Northport, MI 49670 | $120,420 |
71 | Leo Dietrich & Sons LLC | Conklin, MI 49403 | $119,485 |
72 | Jelinek Orchards Limited Liabilit | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $118,563 |
73 | Denis L Garvin | Cedar, MI 49621 | $117,949 |
74 | Cherry Longbranch Inc | Cedar, MI 49621 | $117,470 |
75 | Ronald Rhoads | Cedar, MI 49621 | $115,165 |
76 | Bruce Carlson | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $112,270 |
77 | Garthe Farms | Northport, MI 49670 | $111,587 |
78 | S P Grossnickle LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $111,292 |
79 | John M Werner | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $106,765 |
80 | Suttons Pointe Farms | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $106,424 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”