Total Commodity Programs in Leelanau County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 292
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $7,313,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Krt Farms | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $31,830 |
62 | Jelinek Orchards LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $31,582 |
63 | R&r Flores Farms | Cedar, MI 49621 | $31,225 |
64 | William S Casier | Empire, MI 49630 | $30,694 |
65 | Jonathan Richter | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $30,391 |
66 | Shady Lane Partners LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $30,082 |
67 | Meadowlark Farm LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $29,936 |
68 | Sleeping Bear Orchards LLC | Empire, MI 49630 | $29,178 |
69 | Lakeview Hills Organic Farm LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $28,540 |
70 | William Green | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $27,829 |
71 | Alpers Farms LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $25,791 |
72 | Victor Chimoski | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $25,042 |
73 | Stanton Family Orchards LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $24,909 |
74 | Cathead Farms | Northport, MI 49670 | $24,003 |
75 | Egeler's Red Acres LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $23,658 |
76 | Spinniken Orchards Inc | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $23,066 |
77 | Joseph Miller | Maple City, MI 49664 | $22,160 |
78 | Fredrickson Farm | Northport, MI 49670 | $21,693 |
79 | Jeff Send | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $21,501 |
80 | Sunblossom Orchards LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $21,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”