Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Leelanau County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 181
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $8,701,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Grant Farms | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $38,194 |
82 | Ronald Rhoads | Cedar, MI 49621 | $34,129 |
83 | Robert Anderson | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $33,631 |
84 | Legacy Orchards Inc | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $31,775 |
85 | Boathouse Vineyards LLC | Leland, MI 49654 | $31,650 |
86 | Maple Valley Farms Inc - Shimek | Maple City, MI 49664 | $31,452 |
87 | John Nink | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $30,922 |
88 | Wesley Parker | Cedar, MI 49621 | $30,428 |
89 | John P Kilcherman | Northport, MI 49670 | $29,711 |
90 | Michael Schaub | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $28,890 |
91 | Cab Vineyards LLC | Lakeland, MI 48143 | $28,710 |
92 | Creighton Shaine Gallagher | Cedar, MI 49621 | $27,551 |
93 | Joseph Flaska | Maple City, MI 49664 | $26,007 |
94 | Lowell Goff | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $25,771 |
95 | Spinniken Orchards Inc | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $24,552 |
96 | Leonard A Mike Mikowski | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $23,092 |
97 | Joseph A Fabiszak | Cedar, MI 49621 | $22,085 |
98 | Bakker's Acres LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $20,443 |
99 | Whitt Co LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $20,442 |
100 | Ciccone Vineyards & Winery LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $19,987 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”