Farm Subsidy information
Leelanau County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Leelanau County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 438
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $37,203,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stanek Brothers | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $283,638 |
22 | Joseph Miller | Maple City, MI 49664 | $274,778 |
23 | Theodore Schaub | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $272,135 |
24 | Carlson Farms | Northport, MI 49670 | $259,494 |
25 | John H Schlueter | Cedar, MI 49621 | $255,841 |
26 | Frammi Enterprises Inc | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $246,629 |
27 | Runge Farms LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $240,990 |
28 | Harbor Hill Fruit Farms Inc | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $240,892 |
29 | Donald Bugai | Cedar, MI 49621 | $239,808 |
30 | Blaise Korson | Northport, MI 49670 | $237,623 |
31 | Jeff Send | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $231,408 |
32 | Sleeping Bear Orchards LLC | Empire, MI 49630 | $230,492 |
33 | John Gallagher | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $229,141 |
34 | Victor Chimoski | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $228,037 |
35 | Rhoadside Acres Inc | Cedar, MI 49621 | $209,464 |
36 | James Burkhart | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $208,332 |
37 | Hohnke & Sons Inc | Cedar, MI 49621 | $201,360 |
38 | Thomas Shimek | Empire, MI 49630 | $200,673 |
39 | Virginia Eitzen | Cedar, MI 49621 | $192,994 |
40 | Jonathan Richter | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $190,509 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”