Farm Subsidy information
Leelanau County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Leelanau County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 129
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $4,151,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Victor Chimoski | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $39,750 |
22 | John H Schlueter | Cedar, MI 49621 | $37,522 |
23 | Frammi Enterprises Inc | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $37,252 |
24 | Buckhorn Orchards LLC | Empire, MI 49630 | $33,823 |
25 | Michael Alan Morris Dba Breeze Hill Greenhouse | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $31,994 |
26 | Hallstedt Homestead LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $31,328 |
27 | Bruce Carlson | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $30,302 |
28 | Terry Lautner | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $27,927 |
29 | Shady Lane Partners LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $26,158 |
30 | Hop Daddy LLC | Empire, MI 49630 | $25,682 |
31 | Svf Inc | Northport, MI 49670 | $25,020 |
32 | S P Grossnickle LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $24,745 |
33 | Garthe Farms LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $23,228 |
34 | D & D Noonan Farms LLC | Empire, MI 49630 | $22,773 |
35 | Bakker's Acres LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $22,631 |
36 | Ron Collins Jr | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $21,498 |
37 | Lowell Goff | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $20,606 |
38 | Eugenie Von Holt | Northport, MI 49670 | $20,600 |
39 | Jeff Send | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $20,028 |
40 | Joseph Flaska | Maple City, MI 49664 | $18,854 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”