Total Disaster Programs in Leelanau County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 284
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $22,216,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Harbor Hill Fruit Farms Inc | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $177,593 |
42 | David Alpers | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $162,680 |
43 | Maple Valley Farms - Deering | Empire, MI 49630 | $162,168 |
44 | Arthur T Mcmanus | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $151,608 |
45 | Bill W Hoxie | Cedar, MI 49621 | $149,893 |
46 | Kiessel Farms LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $148,573 |
47 | Black Farms | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $148,553 |
48 | John B Boomer Dba | Empire, MI 49630 | $143,732 |
49 | Michael A Mcmanus | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $142,884 |
50 | Norman Morgan | Northport, MI 49670 | $136,634 |
51 | James Bardenhagen | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $132,787 |
52 | Noonan & Sons | Maple City, MI 49664 | $129,208 |
53 | Maple Valley Farms Inc - Shimek | Maple City, MI 49664 | $128,778 |
54 | Garthe Farms LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $127,858 |
55 | Hallstedt Homestead LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $123,931 |
56 | Richard Deering Jr | Northport, MI 49670 | $121,514 |
57 | Richard Popp | Northport, MI 49670 | $121,413 |
58 | Leo Dietrich & Sons LLC | Conklin, MI 49403 | $119,485 |
59 | Grant Farms | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $117,590 |
60 | Ronald Rhoads | Cedar, MI 49621 | $115,165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”