Total Commodity Programs in Leelanau County, Michigan, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $135,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | La Casa Verde Produce, LLC | Cedar, MI 49621 | $1,074 |
22 | Denis L Garvin | Cedar, MI 49621 | $1,073 |
23 | Donald R Carlson | Northport, MI 49670 | $1,038 |
24 | Keith E Parker | Cedar, MI 49621 | $976 |
25 | David M Noonan | Empire, MI 49630 | $921 |
26 | Erich Lautner | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $870 |
27 | Lakeview Hills Organic Farm LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $815 |
28 | Second Spring Farm, LLC | Cedar, MI 49621 | $750 |
29 | Linda Grigg | Maple City, MI 49664 | $750 |
30 | Meadowlark Farm LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $750 |
31 | Allen And Associates, Inc. | Empire, MI 49630 | $750 |
32 | Allen And Associates, Inc. | Empire, MI 49630 | $750 |
33 | Steven G Taber | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $748 |
34 | Wencil T Korson | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $736 |
35 | Mark Zientek | Maple City, MI 49664 | $663 |
36 | Olsen Farms LLC | Maple City, MI 49664 | $654 |
37 | Gregory Mikowski | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $646 |
38 | Heartwood Forest Farm LLC | Cedar, MI 49621 | $626 |
39 | Michael F Ulrich | Empire, MI 49630 | $581 |
40 | Brian Verschaeve | Maple City, MI 49664 | $499 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”