Production Flexibility Program in Missaukee County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 225
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Missaukee County, Michigan totaled $2,704,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Raymond Booms | Lake City, MI 49651 | $4,920 |
122 | Willard Vanhaitsma | Mc Bain, MI 49657 | $4,809 |
123 | Jerry Zuiderveen | Falmouth, MI 49632 | $4,501 |
124 | Bernard Vanderveen | Caledonia, MI 49316 | $4,398 |
125 | Bruce Rendon | Lake City, MI 49651 | $4,140 |
126 | David Burdine | West Branch, MI 48661 | $4,103 |
127 | Ivan Loveless Jr | Falmouth, MI 49632 | $4,084 |
128 | Gordon Koolstra | Lake City, MI 49651 | $4,035 |
129 | Rodney Koolstra | Lake City, MI 49651 | $4,035 |
130 | Dennis Koolstra | Lake City, MI 49651 | $4,035 |
131 | Sidney Koolstra | Lake City, MI 49651 | $4,029 |
132 | Sheryl Hoekstra | Mc Bain, MI 49657 | $3,998 |
133 | Judith Vandermeulen | Mc Bain, MI 49657 | $3,967 |
134 | Leland Bogard | Mc Bain, MI 49657 | $3,951 |
135 | Terry Elsholz | Merritt, MI 49667 | $3,886 |
136 | Charlie Owen Helsel | Lake City, MI 49651 | $3,706 |
137 | David Marcusse | Lake City, MI 49651 | $3,628 |
138 | Gordon Rozeveld | Mc Bain, MI 49657 | $3,458 |
139 | Donald Smith | Lake City, MI 49651 | $3,324 |
140 | Steve Schoo | Falmouth, MI 49632 | $3,169 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”