Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Monroe County, Michigan, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 77
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Monroe County, Michigan totaled $74,752 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Douglas V Sheats | Milan, MI 48160 | $329 |
42 | Jacob C Janssen | Monroe, MI 48161 | $307 |
43 | Todd J Taylor | Ottawa Lake, MI 49267 | $301 |
44 | Ryan Sieler | Dundee, MI 48131 | $286 |
45 | James R Dolezal | Ida, MI 48140 | $263 |
46 | Merissa Thompson | Temperance, MI 48182 | $246 |
47 | Carolyn Rath | Monroe, MI 48161 | $229 |
48 | Daniel Mclaughlin III | South Rockwood, MI 48179 | $194 |
49 | Amy Suzanne Wahl | Ottawa Lake, MI 49267 | $180 |
50 | Derek D Van Stone | Carleton, MI 48117 | $169 |
51 | Cheryl Lavender | Marietta, GA 30064 | $166 |
52 | William S Gay | Carleton, MI 48117 | $165 |
53 | Holly L Becker | Tecumseh, MI 49286 | $162 |
54 | Myrna Montri | Ida, MI 48140 | $154 |
55 | Ryan R Pittman Jr | Monroe, MI 48161 | $146 |
56 | Barbara C Siebarth | Monroe, MI 48161 | $145 |
57 | Shay Neddo | Carleton, MI 48117 | $132 |
58 | Lucille Miller | Monroe, MI 48162 | $114 |
59 | Michael Opfermann | La Salle, MI 48145 | $108 |
60 | Ruth Osgood | Monroe, MI 48162 | $92 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”