Farm Subsidy information
Monroe County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Monroe County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,499
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monroe County, Michigan totaled $222,315,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Cornprobst Farms Inc | Temperance, MI 48182 | $347,093 |
122 | Bruce Ahleman | Ottawa Lake, MI 49267 | $345,974 |
123 | Wilbert Sieler | Dundee, MI 48131 | $340,375 |
124 | Mark E Chapman | South Rockwood, MI 48179 | $338,622 |
125 | Joseph Horak Jr | Deerfield, MI 49238 | $337,214 |
126 | James Vanbuskirk | Carleton, MI 48117 | $336,224 |
127 | Bryan Reaume | Carleton, MI 48117 | $331,609 |
128 | Mark Masserant | Newport, MI 48166 | $319,040 |
129 | James Montri | Ida, MI 48140 | $317,668 |
130 | Harold Heath | Milan, MI 48160 | $312,483 |
131 | Robert Vacek | Carleton, MI 48117 | $310,779 |
132 | Alan Ahleman | Ottawa Lake, MI 49267 | $309,598 |
133 | Donald Sahloff | Ottawa Lake, MI 49267 | $307,638 |
134 | Dale Stahl | Deerfield, MI 49238 | $304,409 |
135 | Mark Parran | Petersburg, MI 49270 | $298,327 |
136 | Matt Schultz | Dundee, MI 48131 | $296,652 |
137 | David Anteau | La Salle, MI 48145 | $296,108 |
138 | Happy Farms LLC | Maybee, MI 48159 | $294,702 |
139 | Jack Lennard | Riga, MI 49276 | $294,651 |
140 | Robert L Studnicka | Milan, MI 48160 | $290,550 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”