Total Commodity Programs in Montcalm County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 309
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Montcalm County, Michigan totaled $4,433,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Fahner Farms LLC | Pierson, MI 49339 | $17,635 |
62 | Jackson Farms | Stanton, MI 48888 | $17,004 |
63 | Ronald David Christensen | Trufant, MI 49347 | $16,530 |
64 | Hillhaven Farms Inc | Edmore, MI 48829 | $16,505 |
65 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $16,486 |
66 | Daniel James Smith | Carson City, MI 48811 | $16,251 |
67 | Brian D Smith | Sumner, MI 48889 | $16,177 |
68 | Christopher Mark | Lakeview, MI 48850 | $15,664 |
69 | Todd L Smith | Sand Lake, MI 49343 | $15,493 |
70 | Daniel Ryan | Sheridan, MI 48884 | $15,486 |
71 | Chad H Wing | Fenwick, MI 48834 | $14,641 |
72 | Nielsen Dairy Farm LLC | Coral, MI 49322 | $14,285 |
73 | Herbert Wing | Fenwick, MI 48834 | $13,964 |
74 | Shane Thomas Smith | Fenwick, MI 48834 | $13,961 |
75 | Lynn S Ritz | Fenwick, MI 48834 | $12,741 |
76 | Mervin Dailey | Edmore, MI 48829 | $12,517 |
77 | Lawrence J Mccrackin | Carson City, MI 48811 | $12,400 |
78 | Brian Lee Stratton | Edmore, MI 48829 | $11,938 |
79 | David Ivan Wickes | Stanton, MI 48888 | $11,560 |
80 | Hugh Roberts | Fenwick, MI 48834 | $11,102 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”