Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Montcalm County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 424
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Montcalm County, Michigan totaled $11,577,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert L Keeler | Stanton, MI 48888 | $79,960 |
42 | Ronald David Christensen | Trufant, MI 49347 | $77,965 |
43 | Richard F Karnatz | Greenville, MI 48838 | $72,139 |
44 | Rader Farms LLC | Lakeview, MI 48850 | $69,798 |
45 | Duane Braman | Stanton, MI 48888 | $69,235 |
46 | Randy Dragt | Howard City, MI 49329 | $68,504 |
47 | Nielsen Dairy Farm LLC | Coral, MI 49322 | $68,178 |
48 | Pine Hills Dairy LLC | Howard City, MI 49329 | $67,326 |
49 | Gordon Behrenwald | Lakeview, MI 48850 | $66,601 |
50 | Eugene Brian Rentschler | Lakeview, MI 48850 | $66,224 |
51 | Johnson Ag LLC | Howard City, MI 49329 | $65,461 |
52 | C Bruce Noll | Sheridan, MI 48884 | $65,072 |
53 | Lawrence J Mccrackin | Carson City, MI 48811 | $65,027 |
54 | Vernon Duane Adams | Stanton, MI 48888 | $63,801 |
55 | Oberlin Farms LLC | Lakeview, MI 48850 | $62,956 |
56 | Hugh Roberts | Fenwick, MI 48834 | $62,111 |
57 | Chad H Wing | Fenwick, MI 48834 | $61,482 |
58 | Albern Olson Etal Part | Stanton, MI 48888 | $61,317 |
59 | Gregory M Koehn | Carson City, MI 48811 | $60,782 |
60 | Double B Dairy Dba | Lakeview, MI 48850 | $59,819 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”