Counter Cyclical Program in Montcalm County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 735
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Montcalm County, Michigan totaled $3,354,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Laverne Bruce Hansen | Edmore, MI 48829 | $29,351 |
22 | Haynes Farms LLC Xxxxxx | Stanton, MI 48888 | $28,206 |
23 | K & R Farms Partnership | Carson City, MI 48811 | $27,976 |
24 | Paulen Farms Inc | Howard City, MI 49329 | $26,420 |
25 | Crawford Farms Inc | Lakeview, MI 48850 | $25,141 |
26 | Mc Farms LLC | Carson City, MI 48811 | $24,642 |
27 | Moonrise Farming Company LLC | Coopersville, MI 49404 | $24,636 |
28 | Gregory D Johnson | Howard City, MI 49329 | $24,321 |
29 | Brandon R Carlson Trust | Howard City, MI 49329 | $24,230 |
30 | Porter Grain Farms LLC | Rockford, MI 49341 | $24,170 |
31 | Greg Lee Mccarthy | Edmore, MI 48829 | $24,156 |
32 | Lee R Peterson | Edmore, MI 48829 | $23,634 |
33 | Ronald David Christensen | Trufant, MI 49347 | $23,120 |
34 | Steven Howard Sutherland | Sheridan, MI 48884 | $22,935 |
35 | Daniel James Smith | Carson City, MI 48811 | $22,629 |
36 | Black Locust Farm LLC | Stanton, MI 48888 | $22,505 |
37 | Davis Farms LLC | Rockford, MI 49341 | $21,226 |
38 | John J Mccrackin | Carson City, MI 48811 | $20,798 |
39 | Mccracken Farms | Carson City, MI 48811 | $20,632 |
40 | Sackett Acres Inc | Edmore, MI 48829 | $20,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”