Farm Subsidy information
Montcalm County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Montcalm County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,178
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montcalm County, Michigan totaled $177,025,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sackett Ranch Inc | Stanton, MI 48888 | $2,400,126 |
2 | Thorlund Bros Part | Greenville, MI 48838 | $2,151,988 |
3 | Ken Newell Dba Newell Farms | Trufant, MI 49347 | $1,942,760 |
4 | John Ryan | Carson City, MI 48811 | $1,940,567 |
5 | Tom Ryan | Carson City, MI 48811 | $1,753,220 |
6 | Andersen Brothers LLC | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $1,712,551 |
7 | Paulen Farms Inc | Howard City, MI 49329 | $1,601,607 |
8 | Main Farms LLC | Six Lakes, MI 48886 | $1,530,122 |
9 | Meadow Rock Dairy LLC | Grand Rapids, MI 49544 | $1,434,051 |
10 | Ray Christensen | Greenville, MI 48838 | $1,366,040 |
11 | Paul Main | Six Lakes, MI 48886 | $1,335,583 |
12 | Oak Lea Farms Inc | Carson City, MI 48811 | $1,315,826 |
13 | Porter Grain Farms LLC | Rockford, MI 49341 | $1,294,525 |
14 | Black Locust Farm LLC | Stanton, MI 48888 | $1,255,440 |
15 | Larry Ek | Stanton, MI 48888 | $1,195,995 |
16 | Grassley Farms Part | Howard City, MI 49329 | $1,112,626 |
17 | Hillhaven Farms Inc | Edmore, MI 48829 | $980,959 |
18 | Greg Lee Mccarthy | Edmore, MI 48829 | $922,443 |
19 | James Braman | Edmore, MI 48829 | $905,370 |
20 | Mc Farms LLC | Carson City, MI 48811 | $897,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>