Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Muskegon County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 41
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Muskegon County, Michigan totaled $2,003,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Swanson Pickle Co Inc | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $17,906 |
22 | David Bayne | Twin Lake, MI 49457 | $16,821 |
23 | Robinson Farm Trucking Inc | Bailey, MI 49303 | $13,116 |
24 | Brian S Abbott | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $12,049 |
25 | Dean Paul Stevens | Casnovia, MI 49318 | $11,755 |
26 | Skanee Orchard Company, LLC | Kent City, MI 49330 | $11,329 |
27 | Timothy A Heiss | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $8,400 |
28 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $6,796 |
29 | George K Herman | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $5,157 |
30 | Dean Kantola | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $5,084 |
31 | Timothy J Spoelman | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $4,416 |
32 | Robert Bean | Holton, MI 49425 | $4,282 |
33 | Michael Cockerill Farms | Montague, MI 49437 | $4,050 |
34 | Troy Johnson | Casnovia, MI 49318 | $3,457 |
35 | Leon Michael Wolverton | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $2,351 |
36 | James L Millett | Bailey, MI 49303 | $2,206 |
37 | Gerald J Walter | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $1,861 |
38 | K & D Freeland Farms | Bailey, MI 49303 | $1,733 |
39 | Roger Peacock | Coopersville, MI 49404 | $1,204 |
40 | Phillip Andrew Kantola | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $419 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”