Farm Subsidy information
Muskegon County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Muskegon County, Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 36
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Muskegon County, Michigan totaled $4,705,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | D & D Freeland's Green Top LLC | Kent City, MI 49330 | $713,254 |
2 | John & Stacey Alt Farms | Kent City, MI 49330 | $390,189 |
3 | Nels And Luanne Nyblad Family Far | Casnovia, MI 49318 | $373,898 |
4 | Snappy Apple Farms Inc | Casnovia, MI 49318 | $191,355 |
5 | Swanson Pickle Co Inc | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $160,189 |
6 | Kent Fruit Farms LLC | Casnovia, MI 49318 | $125,000 |
7 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $113,450 |
8 | Laketon Orchards LLC | Conklin, MI 49403 | $101,611 |
9 | Gee Orchards, LLC | Bailey, MI 49303 | $86,549 |
10 | Skanee Orchard Company, LLC | Kent City, MI 49330 | $49,694 |
11 | , | $30,780 | |
12 | Henry Kessler And Son Farms LLC | Montague, MI 49437 | $27,416 |
13 | Robert T Wackernagel | Montague, MI 49437 | $19,631 |
14 | Crowley Farms LLC | Ravenna, MI 49451 | $13,851 |
15 | Robinson Farm Trucking Inc | Bailey, MI 49303 | $12,305 |
16 | Robert Bean | Holton, MI 49425 | $11,687 |
17 | Shepard Farms | Sparta, MI 49345 | $10,452 |
18 | , | $9,037 | |
19 | David Bayne | Twin Lake, MI 49457 | $7,159 |
20 | Mary Bernadette Vandenbrink | Coopersville, MI 49404 | $6,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>