Farm Subsidy information
Oakland County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Oakland County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 184
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oakland County, Michigan totaled $9,996,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Nykara LLC | Waterford, MI 48327 | $2,353 |
102 | Charles Korpak | White Lake, MI 48386 | $2,322 |
103 | Henry Rossi | Milford, MI 48381 | $2,283 |
104 | Mary Rossi | Milford, MI 48381 | $2,283 |
105 | Anthony Diponio | Milford, MI 48381 | $2,283 |
106 | Mary Jane Naz | Cincinnati, OH 45236 | $2,229 |
107 | The John M Cook Trust Of May 21 1 | Unknown, MI 48000 | $2,224 |
108 | Carol Lee Redman | Homer, MI 49245 | $2,195 |
109 | Zander Duffield | Oxford, MI 48370 | $2,045 |
110 | Dr John F Naz | Clarkston, MI 48346 | $1,908 |
111 | R Schapman Ptr Dba Ingleside Farms | Bruce Twp, MI 48065 | $1,899 |
112 | Carmody Brothers | Fenton, MI 48430 | $1,831 |
113 | Raymond S Gavin | Gaines, MI 48436 | $1,698 |
114 | Leslie Haight | Clarkston, MI 48346 | $1,633 |
115 | John Comps | Leonard, MI 48367 | $1,500 |
116 | John Lucius Canfield | New Hudson, MI 48165 | $1,374 |
117 | T Neil Wagner | Metamora, MI 48455 | $1,278 |
118 | Merritt William Marshall | Holly, MI 48442 | $1,177 |
119 | Davisburg Farms LLC | West Bloomfield, MI 48322 | $1,173 |
120 | Milan George Jr | Whitmore Lake, MI 48189 | $1,162 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”