Total Conservation Programs in Oceana County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 163
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Oceana County, Michigan totaled $2,313,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Cherry Mill Inc | Hart, MI 49420 | $5,622 |
62 | Brent Clark | Grand Haven, MI 49417 | $5,613 |
63 | Marvin Aebig | New Era, MI 49446 | $5,532 |
64 | Lois E Chase | Hesperia, MI 49421 | $5,130 |
65 | Vanagtmael Orchards Inc | Hart, MI 49420 | $5,103 |
66 | Charles Deyman | Muskegon, MI 49443 | $4,896 |
67 | Eugene Kokx & Son | Hart, MI 49420 | $4,875 |
68 | Donald Walsworth | Mears, MI 49436 | $4,868 |
69 | Randall W Jancek | Big Rapids, MI 49307 | $4,831 |
70 | Janice Trommater | Hart, MI 49420 | $4,830 |
71 | Wilma Vanduien | New Era, MI 49446 | $4,508 |
72 | Mitchell Jonassen | Hart, MI 49420 | $4,342 |
73 | William Rossiter | Holton, MI 49425 | $4,209 |
74 | Craig A Herremans | Hart, MI 49420 | $4,061 |
75 | David K Ramthun | New Era, MI 49446 | $3,876 |
76 | Hekkema & Son | Whitehall, MI 49461 | $3,770 |
77 | Lorena Lindgren Schmiedeknecht | Mears, MI 49436 | $3,751 |
78 | Harold Kempker | Hart, MI 49420 | $3,587 |
79 | Armondo Rosalez | East Lansing, MI 48823 | $3,312 |
80 | Simon D Tenbrink | Spring Lake, MI 49456 | $3,252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”