Farm Subsidy information
Ogemaw County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Ogemaw County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 627
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ogemaw County, Michigan totaled $47,188,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Deven D David | West Branch, MI 48661 | $442,666 |
22 | Rmj Dairy Farm L L C | Rose City, MI 48654 | $435,182 |
23 | Miller Farms Enterprises L L C | Prescott, MI 48756 | $425,907 |
24 | Derek J Brewer | West Branch, MI 48661 | $383,231 |
25 | Davids Acres LLC | Prescott, MI 48756 | $378,031 |
26 | Alvis Michael Laier | Alger, MI 48610 | $374,518 |
27 | Kartes Farms LLC | Alger, MI 48610 | $366,979 |
28 | Sheltrown Farms | Alger, MI 48610 | $364,315 |
29 | Doris Grezeszak | Rose City, MI 48654 | $321,330 |
30 | Wangler & Sons Trucking Inc | West Branch, MI 48661 | $309,996 |
31 | Wangler And Sons Farm Inc | West Branch, MI 48661 | $295,562 |
32 | Lisa M Diehl | Lupton, MI 48635 | $283,123 |
33 | T R Timber Co | West Branch, MI 48661 | $282,421 |
34 | Ronald Wangler | West Branch, MI 48661 | $280,444 |
35 | Schmitt Dairy Farms LLC | West Branch, MI 48661 | $276,861 |
36 | Reetz Brothers Dairy | West Branch, MI 48661 | $275,507 |
37 | Brown Farms LLC | Prescott, MI 48756 | $273,961 |
38 | Schagel Dairy Farm | Prescott, MI 48756 | $269,278 |
39 | Emt Farms LLC | West Branch, MI 48661 | $264,189 |
40 | J & B Dairy, LLC | Prescott, MI 48756 | $256,188 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”