Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Ogemaw County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 165
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Ogemaw County, Michigan totaled $1,965,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Florent C David | West Branch, MI 48661 | $6,180 |
62 | Krantz Farm LLC | Prescott, MI 48756 | $6,122 |
63 | Gerald J Colvin | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $6,093 |
64 | David Joesph Dematio | West Branch, MI 48661 | $5,948 |
65 | Carl B Mccauley | Alger, MI 48610 | $5,625 |
66 | Jesse Sabo | Prescott, MI 48756 | $5,478 |
67 | Walter L Barringer | Bentley, MI 48613 | $5,349 |
68 | Mary Morrison | Prescott, MI 48756 | $5,091 |
69 | Troy M Gawne | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $5,027 |
70 | Dennis J Rau | West Branch, MI 48661 | $5,023 |
71 | Stillwagon Farms LLC | West Branch, MI 48661 | $4,849 |
72 | Thomas Lee Klacking | West Branch, MI 48661 | $4,590 |
73 | Gary Klacking | West Branch, MI 48661 | $4,590 |
74 | Casey Lee Zuchnik | Prescott, MI 48756 | $4,570 |
75 | Thomas P Kopec | West Branch, MI 48661 | $4,226 |
76 | Troy K Farro | Prescott, MI 48756 | $4,196 |
77 | Ronald Wangler | West Branch, MI 48661 | $4,141 |
78 | James Donald Redmond | Prescott, MI 48756 | $3,995 |
79 | James Morris | West Branch, MI 48661 | $3,705 |
80 | Geran D Zettle | West Branch, MI 48661 | $3,599 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”