Farm Subsidy information
Ogemaw County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Ogemaw County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 627
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ogemaw County, Michigan totaled $47,188,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jeffrey J Janish | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $31,566 |
122 | Charles E Walters | Prescott, MI 48756 | $30,225 |
123 | Handrich Trucking Inc | Mio, MI 48647 | $30,000 |
124 | Matthews Mill Inc | South Branch, MI 48761 | $29,718 |
125 | Earl Bowsher | West Branch, MI 48661 | $29,685 |
126 | Sam Zettel Dairy Farm LLC | West Branch, MI 48661 | $29,685 |
127 | Thomas Zettle | West Branch, MI 48661 | $29,213 |
128 | Calvin Grezeszak | Lupton, MI 48635 | $29,079 |
129 | Logan Mier Farms Corporation | Prescott, MI 48756 | $28,762 |
130 | Paige Mier | Prescott, MI 48756 | $28,613 |
131 | Michael P Gregg | Hale, MI 48739 | $28,529 |
132 | Stillwagon Farms LLC | West Branch, MI 48661 | $28,199 |
133 | Walter L Barringer | Bentley, MI 48613 | $27,640 |
134 | Carl B Mccauley | Alger, MI 48610 | $26,988 |
135 | Thomas Lee Klacking | West Branch, MI 48661 | $26,944 |
136 | Great Lakes Lamb LLC | West Branch, MI 48661 | $26,019 |
137 | David Zettle | West Branch, MI 48661 | $25,884 |
138 | John Nelson | Lupton, MI 48635 | $25,828 |
139 | Conrad Meir | West Branch, MI 48661 | $25,635 |
140 | Gary Morgan | Beaver Island, MI 49782 | $25,302 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”