Counter Cyclical Program in Ogemaw County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 227
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Ogemaw County, Michigan totaled $662,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Allan W Fach | Rose City, MI 48654 | $646 |
122 | Jeffery Marshall | West Branch, MI 48661 | $645 |
123 | Lorre M Darnell | Hale, MI 48739 | $634 |
124 | Robert Forro | Prescott, MI 48756 | $627 |
125 | Jesse Sabo | Prescott, MI 48756 | $626 |
126 | Gary Morgan | Beaver Island, MI 49782 | $597 |
127 | Walter Reetz | West Branch, MI 48661 | $596 |
128 | David G Stillwagon | West Branch, MI 48661 | $573 |
129 | John M Stillwagon | West Branch, MI 48661 | $573 |
130 | David Zettle | West Branch, MI 48661 | $539 |
131 | Douglas Wymer | West Branch, MI 48661 | $538 |
132 | Robert Filhart | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $536 |
133 | Deborah L Bemke | West Branch, MI 48661 | $535 |
134 | Daryl Weishuhn | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $523 |
135 | Michael Fachting | Prescott, MI 48756 | $505 |
136 | Val W Dupont | Harrison Township, MI 48045 | $494 |
137 | Gerald Buhlman | West Branch, MI 48661 | $486 |
138 | Leonard J Walker | West Branch, MI 48661 | $468 |
139 | Cindy S Defreese | Grand Rapids, MI 49509 | $468 |
140 | Ronald Sesler | Prescott, MI 48756 | $449 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”