Farm Subsidy information
Saint Joseph County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Saint Joseph County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,660
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Joseph County, Michigan totaled $184,772,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | John Robert Ware | Burr Oak, MI 49030 | $264,064 |
162 | Nancy Barney | Mendon, MI 49072 | $261,143 |
163 | Lynn M Miller | South Bend, IN 46601 | $260,242 |
164 | Twin Oak Farms LLC | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $255,641 |
165 | Kenneth Yoder | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $253,070 |
166 | Charles W Hilton | Constantine, MI 49042 | $251,660 |
167 | Darcy J Jones | Constantine, MI 49042 | $250,932 |
168 | Scott Lee Cronkhite | Burr Oak, MI 49030 | $250,827 |
169 | Troy R Piper | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $249,499 |
170 | Rodney Baker | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $246,809 |
171 | Stanley N Yoder | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $246,270 |
172 | Wagner Farms | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $240,603 |
173 | Angela M Crotser | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $240,112 |
174 | Timothy L Piper | Fulton, MI 49052 | $239,121 |
175 | Mark R Sharp | Colon, MI 49040 | $237,623 |
176 | Troyer-vue Farms LLC | Burr Oak, MI 49030 | $236,215 |
177 | Jerry Lee Cronkhite | Burr Oak, MI 49030 | $234,336 |
178 | Kenneth R Wall | Burr Oak, MI 49030 | $233,742 |
179 | David Alan Frost | Mendon, MI 49072 | $229,156 |
180 | Jack R Hensell | Constantine, MI 49042 | $228,967 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”