Farm Subsidy information
Saint Joseph County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Saint Joseph County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,637
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Joseph County, Michigan totaled $179,662,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sturgis Dairy LLC | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $834,488 |
42 | Eugene Miller | Constantine, MI 49042 | $827,512 |
43 | Lavon Yoder | Mendon, MI 49072 | $790,319 |
44 | Kim S Cupp | Mendon, MI 49072 | $787,411 |
45 | Vernon J Yoder | Centreville, MI 49032 | $781,236 |
46 | Timothy John Wagner | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $777,738 |
47 | Douglas Edward Diekman | Mendon, MI 49072 | $764,818 |
48 | Mark Andrew Stephenson | Mendon, MI 49072 | $762,562 |
49 | F. Keith Borgert | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $761,465 |
50 | Walters Farms | Burr Oak, MI 49030 | $758,793 |
51 | Kenneth N Cupp | Mendon, MI 49072 | $754,859 |
52 | Wayne L Wilds | Mendon, MI 49072 | $754,556 |
53 | Douglas L Brueck | Leonidas, MI 49066 | $748,256 |
54 | Gem Family Farms LLC | Constantine, MI 49042 | $728,851 |
55 | Stutzman Poultry Farms LLC | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $719,347 |
56 | Wilma A Miller | Constantine, MI 49042 | $718,929 |
57 | Stears Farms Inc | Constantine, MI 49042 | $709,750 |
58 | Glenn E Miller | Constantine, MI 49042 | $690,090 |
59 | Sally J Hackenberg | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $663,843 |
60 | Fred W Nagel & Sons Inc | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $652,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”