Direct Payment Program in Saint Joseph County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 858
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Saint Joseph County, Michigan totaled $32,662,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Philip Dufour | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $296,304 |
22 | Richard Paul Cripps | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $290,922 |
23 | Ann M Kauffman | Mendon, MI 49072 | $290,118 |
24 | Fairgrove Farms Inc | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $274,591 |
25 | Level Acres Inc | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $272,294 |
26 | John E Miller | Constantine, MI 49042 | $271,059 |
27 | Triple Y Farms Inc | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $266,275 |
28 | Tena R Miller | Constantine, MI 49042 | $257,897 |
29 | Eugene Miller | Constantine, MI 49042 | $257,780 |
30 | Douglas P Cupp | Mendon, MI 49072 | $256,700 |
31 | Rick Nemire | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $255,143 |
32 | Albert Stutzman | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $253,902 |
33 | Edgar William Miller | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $253,452 |
34 | Gregory P Cupp | Mendon, MI 49072 | $252,292 |
35 | Maple Shade Farm | Mendon, MI 49072 | $246,422 |
36 | Walters Farms | Burr Oak, MI 49030 | $228,805 |
37 | Fred W Nagel & Sons Inc | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $228,092 |
38 | Roger & Anne Gentz-jv | Mendon, MI 49072 | $222,715 |
39 | Wilbur A Yoder | Mendon, MI 49072 | $220,615 |
40 | Kim S Cupp | Mendon, MI 49072 | $218,052 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”