Total Emergency Relief Program in Sanilac County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 181
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Sanilac County, Michigan totaled $2,487,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Douglas H Soule | Croswell, MI 48422 | $27,283 |
22 | Wadsworth Farms Inc | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $27,204 |
23 | Jahn's Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $25,812 |
24 | Steven Jolley | Jeddo, MI 48032 | $24,347 |
25 | R & P Gerstenberger Farms LLC | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $24,218 |
26 | Richard J Kolar | Minden City, MI 48456 | $23,711 |
27 | Roy E Koehler Jr | Applegate, MI 48401 | $23,442 |
28 | Depcinski Farms LLC | Ubly, MI 48475 | $23,213 |
29 | Thomas Parrish | Decker, MI 48426 | $22,215 |
30 | Todd Westley Draggoo | Croswell, MI 48422 | $20,784 |
31 | West Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $20,255 |
32 | Adam Messing | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $19,537 |
33 | Wood Farms Inc | Marlette, MI 48453 | $19,082 |
34 | Gibbs Farm LLC | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $18,461 |
35 | B & B Brown Farms LLC | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $18,422 |
36 | Durand Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $17,743 |
37 | Thomas G Mcwilliams | Port Sanilac, MI 48469 | $17,716 |
38 | Palms Boys LLC | Palms, MI 48465 | $17,605 |
39 | Douglas R Sweet | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $17,365 |
40 | Kenneth Earl Landsburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $17,273 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”