Conservation Reserve Program in Sanilac County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 168
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sanilac County, Michigan totaled $504,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | T & S Farms | Washington, MI 48094 | $2,578 |
62 | James D Klaty | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $2,538 |
63 | Douglas H Wedge Jr | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $2,515 |
64 | Jeff Dufraine | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $2,482 |
65 | Jorge Mata | Marlette, MI 48453 | $2,455 |
66 | Violet Wills | Cass City, MI 48726 | $2,421 |
67 | Timothy D Franzel | Snover, MI 48472 | $2,302 |
68 | Ann Ypma | Ubly, MI 48475 | $2,294 |
69 | Phillip Klaus | Cass City, MI 48726 | $2,205 |
70 | Brandon Bush | Winchester, KY 40391 | $2,184 |
71 | Kevin Trepkowski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $2,091 |
72 | Jack Gierman | Marlette, MI 48453 | $2,082 |
73 | Michael Schumacher | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $2,003 |
74 | Lawrence Colpaert | Ray, MI 48096 | $1,971 |
75 | Ronald Lentz | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $1,966 |
76 | Kelly Watson | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $1,951 |
77 | Adam M Terpenning | Kingston, MI 48741 | $1,897 |
78 | James G Tittsworth | Sterling Heights, MI 48314 | $1,836 |
79 | Deborah L Mcclorey | Cass City, MI 48726 | $1,810 |
80 | David Messing | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $1,638 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”