Conservation Reserve Program in Sanilac County, Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 159
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sanilac County, Michigan totaled $532,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Lee's Dairy Farm LLC | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $1,149 |
102 | James Wagester | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $1,139 |
103 | Kelly Watson | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $1,081 |
104 | Carl Reisner | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $1,078 |
105 | Harold Tarzwell | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $1,064 |
106 | Daniel T Kelly | Port Sanilac, MI 48469 | $1,058 |
107 | , | $1,033 | |
108 | Phillips Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $955 |
109 | Kay Heussner | Marlette, MI 48453 | $953 |
110 | Jan Bowsky | Brown City, MI 48416 | $944 |
111 | William Gray | Lexington, MI 48450 | $918 |
112 | Timothy Ferguson | Washington Twp, MI 48094 | $917 |
113 | Kurtis W Smith | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $916 |
114 | Clifford Gordon | Croswell, MI 48422 | $899 |
115 | John Ray Nielsen III | Brown City, MI 48416 | $895 |
116 | Dale R Hager Revocable Living Trust | Marlette, MI 48453 | $893 |
117 | John H Hesterberg | Fort Gratiot, MI 48059 | $871 |
118 | Paul Sefton | Decker, MI 48426 | $829 |
119 | Walter J Walsh | Ubly, MI 48475 | $809 |
120 | Jeff Tanton | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $786 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”