Farm Subsidy information
Sanilac County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Sanilac County, Michigan, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 312
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sanilac County, Michigan totaled $12,593,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | , | $4,961 | |
122 | R & G Hooper Farms, Inc. | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $4,937 |
123 | Greg Takacs | Melvin, MI 48454 | $4,920 |
124 | Gerald J Paradoski Revocable Trust | Croswell, MI 48422 | $4,914 |
125 | Daniel James-william Hartwick | Applegate, MI 48401 | $4,897 |
126 | West Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $4,859 |
127 | C & R Gordon Farms LLC | Croswell, MI 48422 | $4,839 |
128 | Howard E Wilson | Marlette, MI 48453 | $4,828 |
129 | Todd Westley Draggoo | Croswell, MI 48422 | $4,822 |
130 | Wood Farms Inc | Marlette, MI 48453 | $4,803 |
131 | Joseph A Sutherland | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $4,760 |
132 | David L Osentoski | Ubly, MI 48475 | $4,757 |
133 | Mark J Jensen | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $4,743 |
134 | Douglas R Sweet | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $4,670 |
135 | Justin Mark Gentner | Ruth, MI 48470 | $4,635 |
136 | Thomas Joseph O'mara | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $4,625 |
137 | Stanley W Clark | Croswell, MI 48422 | $4,618 |
138 | Michael C Chisholm | Marlette, MI 48453 | $4,571 |
139 | Steven J Wendorf | Applegate, MI 48401 | $4,566 |
140 | John Michael Harrar | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $4,559 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”