Farm Subsidy information
Shiawassee County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Shiawassee County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 785
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shiawassee County, Michigan totaled $9,743,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cole Riverview Farms Inc | Bancroft, MI 48414 | $170,577 |
| 2 | Reed Dairy Farm LLC | Owosso, MI 48867 | $131,615 |
| 3 | Ritter Farms LLC | Byron, MI 48418 | $125,966 |
| 4 | Apple Dairy Inc | Bancroft, MI 48414 | $113,008 |
| 5 | Larry V Adams | Byron, MI 48418 | $104,786 |
| 6 | W Farms LLC | Elsie, MI 48831 | $103,906 |
| 7 | Vanagen Sod Farm Inc | Bancroft, MI 48414 | $103,868 |
| 8 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $97,402 |
| 9 | Durling Farms Bu LLC | Bancroft, MI 48414 | $96,124 |
| 10 | Wiswasser Bros. Farms LLC | Perry, MI 48872 | $96,014 |
| 11 | George James Zmitko I | Owosso, MI 48867 | $73,826 |
| 12 | Kathleen Zmitko | Owosso, MI 48867 | $73,808 |
| 13 | Levi Zdunic | Durand, MI 48429 | $70,313 |
| 14 | Mr Bradley Corliss Schlicher | Laingsburg, MI 48848 | $67,533 |
| 15 | Frank Martin Vyskocil | New Lothrop, MI 48460 | $65,789 |
| 16 | Braid Farms Inc | Durand, MI 48429 | $62,324 |
| 17 | Mark Senk | Owosso, MI 48867 | $58,533 |
| 18 | Joseph A Szakal | Owosso, MI 48867 | $58,208 |
| 19 | Nicholas A Zdunic | Durand, MI 48429 | $58,181 |
| 20 | Maple Front Farm LLC | Perry, MI 48872 | $57,093 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf