Market Gains in Tuscola County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 119
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Tuscola County, Michigan totaled $2,792,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jeremy Paul Somerville | Cass City, MI 48726 | $3,788 |
82 | Linda R Middleton | Fostoria, MI 48435 | $3,672 |
83 | Randy Gremel | Unionville, MI 48767 | $3,596 |
84 | Burlyn Farms | North Branch, MI 48461 | $3,406 |
85 | Bruce Bierlein | Reese, MI 48757 | $3,357 |
86 | Jonathan M Findlay | Caro, MI 48723 | $3,152 |
87 | Three R Farms Inc | Unionville, MI 48767 | $2,704 |
88 | Jackson Brothers | Caro, MI 48723 | $2,509 |
89 | Findlay Farms Inc | Caro, MI 48723 | $2,443 |
90 | Sattelberg Farms | Unionville, MI 48767 | $2,200 |
91 | Wallace Hecht Inc | Vassar, MI 48768 | $2,041 |
92 | Bay View Farms Inc | Unionville, MI 48767 | $1,902 |
93 | Cort A Hartwick | Deford, MI 48729 | $1,800 |
94 | David P Deering | Deford, MI 48729 | $1,724 |
95 | David Reithel | Unionville, MI 48767 | $1,624 |
96 | Doug Marker | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $1,427 |
97 | Daniel Marker | Kingston, MI 48741 | $1,427 |
98 | Sandra Pike | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $1,393 |
99 | Robert G Kern | Reese, MI 48757 | $1,365 |
100 | Matthew Kern | Reese, MI 48757 | $1,257 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”