Farm Subsidy information
Tuscola County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Tuscola County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 3,758
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tuscola County, Michigan totaled $335,889,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Donald H Rau Jr | Reese, MI 48757 | $407,227 |
142 | Jeffrey J Schlicht | Vassar, MI 48768 | $405,765 |
143 | Gary Vollmar | Lewiston, MI 49756 | $404,706 |
144 | Gary Maurer | Vassar, MI 48768 | $402,668 |
145 | Green Point Dairy LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $400,000 |
146 | Pike Farms LLC | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $397,639 |
147 | Loran Vanbevern | Unionville, MI 48767 | $394,579 |
148 | W Palm Family Farms Inc | Reese, MI 48757 | $393,908 |
149 | Kischnick Bros Inc | Frankenmuth, MI 48734 | $390,978 |
150 | Louis Wehrman | Reese, MI 48757 | $388,855 |
151 | Robert W Decoe | Mayville, MI 48744 | $386,456 |
152 | Hadaway Brothers L L C | Vassar, MI 48768 | $383,626 |
153 | Going Green, G.p. | Canton, MI 48188 | $380,558 |
154 | Ryers Family Farms LLC | Reese, MI 48757 | $375,928 |
155 | Kenneth Hecht | Vassar, MI 48768 | $375,517 |
156 | Engelhard Family Farms LLC | Unionville, MI 48767 | $374,350 |
157 | Dennis Becker | Garden, MI 49835 | $372,898 |
158 | David Lagos | Cass City, MI 48726 | $369,965 |
159 | Satchell Farms | Caro, MI 48723 | $364,393 |
160 | Ruggles Farms | Kingston, MI 48741 | $362,084 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”