Total Commodity Programs in Tuscola County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 740
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Tuscola County, Michigan totaled $6,743,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jason Tj Elenbaum | Mayville, MI 48744 | $54,156 |
22 | Sylvester Farms | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $52,995 |
23 | Bernia Family Farms Inc | Akron, MI 48701 | $52,059 |
24 | Jane M Wood | Kingston, MI 48741 | $50,080 |
25 | Vader And Son LLC | Akron, MI 48701 | $49,445 |
26 | Theodore Klimek | Silverwood, MI 48760 | $48,045 |
27 | W M W Bierlein Farms Ltd | Reese, MI 48757 | $46,431 |
28 | Eric Woodward | Vassar, MI 48768 | $46,046 |
29 | Raymond Wolak, Sole Proprietorship | Kingston, MI 48741 | $45,377 |
30 | Amy L. Bergdolt LLC | Vassar, MI 48768 | $44,869 |
31 | Jmz Farms L L C | Deford, MI 48729 | $43,664 |
32 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $43,610 |
33 | Burns Sons LLC | Millington, MI 48746 | $43,378 |
34 | D'arcy Farms Inc | Kingston, MI 48741 | $42,799 |
35 | Shannon Farms Inc | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $42,678 |
36 | Ackerman & Son LLC | Vassar, MI 48768 | $42,574 |
37 | Saginaw Valley Seedcorn Producers LLC | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $41,774 |
38 | Robert Woodward | Cass City, MI 48726 | $41,230 |
39 | Littleson Farms LLC | Cass City, MI 48726 | $40,680 |
40 | Foster Farms Inc | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $40,261 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”