Deficiency Payment in Van Buren County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 288
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Van Buren County, Michigan totaled $768,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John T Cerven Estate | Decatur, MI 49045 | $3,599 |
62 | Richard Leedy | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $3,593 |
63 | Irving Young | Decatur, MI 49045 | $3,573 |
64 | Peter Stiglich | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $3,546 |
65 | Stanley T Rajzer | Decatur, MI 49045 | $3,516 |
66 | Glendora Farms | Bangor, MI 49013 | $3,500 |
67 | Robert W Canfield | Decatur, MI 49045 | $3,473 |
68 | Joe Mcleese | Decatur, MI 49045 | $3,446 |
69 | Michael K Mcleese | Decatur, MI 49045 | $3,317 |
70 | Theodore Felcyn Jr | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $3,266 |
71 | Charles R Shugars | Lawrence, MI 49064 | $3,184 |
72 | Dennis Howe | Decatur, MI 49045 | $3,130 |
73 | Charles W Cady | Decatur, MI 49045 | $3,098 |
74 | Robert Hosbein | Hartford, MI 49057 | $3,045 |
75 | Donald Wilson Mackellar | Decatur, MI 49045 | $2,974 |
76 | George H Dorr Jr | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $2,936 |
77 | Marvin Devisser | Bangor, MI 49013 | $2,871 |
78 | Keith Richard Nesbitt | Lawton, MI 49065 | $2,752 |
79 | Neoma Mae Rogalla | Grand Junction, MI 49056 | $2,749 |
80 | Patricia Killeen | Gobles, MI 49055 | $2,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”