Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Van Buren County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 128
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Van Buren County, Michigan totaled $3,396,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Michael Retberg | South Haven, MI 49090 | $3,122 |
102 | Drew T Pursley | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $2,970 |
103 | Michael H Mroczek | Decatur, MI 49045 | $2,844 |
104 | Thomas Pursley | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $2,759 |
105 | Robert Z Degrandchamp | South Haven, MI 49090 | $2,649 |
106 | Stocchiero Farms Inc | Bangor, MI 49013 | $2,607 |
107 | Frances Smith | Decatur, MI 49045 | $2,604 |
108 | Earl F Mortimore | Decatur, MI 49045 | $2,559 |
109 | Charles E Madgyesi | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $2,414 |
110 | Lisa Helene Shelton | Lawton, MI 49065 | $1,889 |
111 | William R Multhaupt | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $1,688 |
112 | Ralph C Fusco Jr | Bloomingdale, MI 49026 | $1,624 |
113 | Mark R Stermer | Lawton, MI 49065 | $1,508 |
114 | Mike Pop | Hartford, MI 49057 | $1,504 |
115 | Brian J Cady | Decatur, MI 49045 | $1,392 |
116 | Gordon F Nesbitt | Lawton, MI 49065 | $1,276 |
117 | Ray Scott Shugars | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $1,229 |
118 | Lawrence Lee Glidden | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $1,014 |
119 | Steven Oscar Turner | Decatur, MI 49045 | $889 |
120 | Robert Zeno Degrandchamp | South Haven, MI 49090 | $883 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”