Counter Cyclical Program in Washtenaw County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 543
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Washtenaw County, Michigan totaled $3,002,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Hovatter Brothers Inc | Willis, MI 48191 | $14,674 |
62 | Karl Schenk | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $14,457 |
63 | Edc Bauer Farms LLC | Saline, MI 48176 | $14,035 |
64 | Lloyd Guenther | Saline, MI 48176 | $13,698 |
65 | Kenneth W Hieber | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $13,598 |
66 | Philip D Gordon | Saline, MI 48176 | $13,448 |
67 | James Bristle | Chelsea, MI 48118 | $13,381 |
68 | John M Alexander | Ann Arbor, MI 48105 | $13,125 |
69 | Lloyd & David Jedele LLC | Saline, MI 48176 | $12,632 |
70 | C Ronald Kuhl | Manchester, MI 48158 | $12,621 |
71 | Sunnycrest Farms | Stockbridge, MI 49285 | $12,400 |
72 | Luther Schaible | Manchester, MI 48158 | $12,266 |
73 | Lewis Alan Litwin | Manchester, MI 48158 | $12,249 |
74 | Paul Green | Dearborn, MI 48124 | $12,230 |
75 | Kenneth Stegenga | Saline, MI 48176 | $12,183 |
76 | Harold Roome | Milan, MI 48160 | $11,969 |
77 | Pleasant Valley Farm LLC | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $11,946 |
78 | Thomas Shanahan | Gregory, MI 48137 | $11,605 |
79 | Durussels' Potato Farms Inc | Manchester, MI 48158 | $11,555 |
80 | Paschall Farms LLC | Ypsilanti, MI 48198 | $11,467 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”