Market Loss Assistance Program in Washtenaw County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 672
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Washtenaw County, Michigan totaled $7,694,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kenneth W Hieber | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $35,944 |
62 | Joseph P Kress | Clinton, MI 49236 | $35,910 |
63 | Ernst Farms | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $35,433 |
64 | Lewis Alan Litwin | Manchester, MI 48158 | $33,959 |
65 | Leo-bur Farms LLC | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $33,587 |
66 | Reuben Lesser Jr | Chelsea, MI 48118 | $33,463 |
67 | Pleasant Valley Farm LLC | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $32,580 |
68 | Lynda Sue Elliott | Ypsilanti, MI 48197 | $32,028 |
69 | Lloyd Grau | Chelsea, MI 48118 | $31,830 |
70 | Lloyd & David Jedele LLC | Saline, MI 48176 | $31,780 |
71 | Horning Farms LLC | Manchester, MI 48158 | $31,565 |
72 | Dale Heller Kapp | Ann Arbor, MI 48105 | $31,060 |
73 | Gary A Weidmayer | Manchester, MI 48158 | $30,896 |
74 | Hovatter Brothers Inc | Willis, MI 48191 | $30,782 |
75 | Pat F Farrell | Dexter, MI 48130 | $30,603 |
76 | Brenda Bristle | Manchester, MI 48158 | $30,408 |
77 | Harold Roome | Milan, MI 48160 | $30,262 |
78 | Luther Schaible | Manchester, MI 48158 | $30,177 |
79 | Thomas Allen Zenz | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $29,885 |
80 | Dewey Baker | Clinton, MI 49236 | $29,841 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”