Loan Deficiency in Washtenaw County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 627
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Washtenaw County, Michigan totaled $12,930,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | C Ronald Kuhl | Manchester, MI 48158 | $37,890 |
102 | William Dennis Zink | Saline, MI 48176 | $37,396 |
103 | Gary Grosshans | Ypsilanti, MI 48198 | $37,262 |
104 | James Bristle | Chelsea, MI 48118 | $37,162 |
105 | Andrew P Weber | Pinckney, MI 48169 | $37,122 |
106 | Connie Vreeland | Chelsea, MI 48118 | $36,947 |
107 | Paul Hammond | Saline, MI 48176 | $36,821 |
108 | Merle Kern | Ann Arbor, MI 48105 | $36,589 |
109 | Charles Shearer | Milan, MI 48160 | $36,580 |
110 | Paul W Rothfuss & Sons | Saline, MI 48176 | $36,318 |
111 | Thomas A Vreeland | Ypsilanti, MI 48198 | $35,881 |
112 | Richard E Schmenk Sr | Milan, MI 48160 | $35,693 |
113 | John Gatt | Saline, MI 48176 | $35,483 |
114 | N & D Bohnett Farms LLC | Saline, MI 48176 | $35,326 |
115 | Charles E Hieber | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $35,282 |
116 | Pleasant Valley Farm LLC | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $35,232 |
117 | Richard Bailey | Dexter, MI 48130 | $34,545 |
118 | Lewis Alan Litwin | Manchester, MI 48158 | $34,477 |
119 | Karl Schenk | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $34,370 |
120 | Larry Roehm | Saline, MI 48176 | $33,996 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”