Farm Subsidy information
Washtenaw County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Washtenaw County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 1,436
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washtenaw County, Michigan totaled $143,146,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Howard Keith Sias | Chelsea, MI 48118 | $150,130 |
182 | Watters And Sons Farm | Stockbridge, MI 49285 | $150,021 |
183 | 5-h Farms Inc. | Northville, MI 48168 | $145,720 |
184 | Bernard Ehnis | Ann Arbor, MI 48105 | $145,415 |
185 | James R Tice | Clinton, MI 49236 | $145,384 |
186 | Paul W Rothfuss & Sons | Saline, MI 48176 | $144,812 |
187 | Brian D Sweetland | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $143,876 |
188 | Douglas Kothe | Manchester, MI 48158 | $142,153 |
189 | Duane F Mason | Saline, MI 48176 | $141,882 |
190 | Feldkamp Farms LLC | Saline, MI 48176 | $141,328 |
191 | Scott Rouster | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $139,773 |
192 | Terry Kershner | Clinton, MI 49236 | $139,700 |
193 | Peter N Heydon | Ann Arbor, MI 48107 | $139,691 |
194 | Roderick C Powers | Chelsea, MI 48118 | $136,751 |
195 | George T Schnierle | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $134,266 |
196 | Kleinschmidt Farms LLC | Manchester, MI 48158 | $132,434 |
197 | Pinters Greenhouses Inc | Belleville, MI 48111 | $131,597 |
198 | Thomas Zahn | Saline, MI 48176 | $129,410 |
199 | Gary Luckhardt | Saline, MI 48176 | $128,692 |
200 | Stephen E Bristle | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $128,606 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”